A global survey conducted between September and October 2022, encompassing over 2,000 C-level executives worldwide, revealed that businesses have already experienced the repercussions of climate change. According to the findings, 46 percent of respondents identified resource scarcity and cost as significant challenges affecting their operations, with changing consumption patterns closely following as a key concern.
The Middle East has long been a geopolitical hotspot, but current dynamics are intensifying concerns about regional stability. The risk meter is running high. Ongoing conflicts in Syria, Yemen, and Iraq, coupled with the recent Israeli-Palestinian war, create a volatile mix that has far-reaching implications. The influence of external powers and the potential for proxy wars further escalate the situation and horrible humanitarian crisis. The region's stability is crucial for the people living there - losing it has global repercussions, affecting energy markets, migration patterns, and international security.
A very tangible example of this is illustrated with the global trade routes. Many of the world's leading shipping companies have halted navigation through the Red Sea in reaction to Houthi strikes. This has resulted in the paralysis of a vital maritime route responsible for facilitating 12% of the world's trade. The continuous Houthi attacks are expected to maintain heightened freight insurance rates, causing disruptions in global supply chains and contributing to inflationary pressures. Furthermore, as the conflict encroaches upon Iran, there is an increased risk of disturbances to oil flows in both the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf, potentially leading to a surge in crude prices.
Ukraine remains a focal point in Eastern Europe and the world as such. With the conflict in the eastern regions simmering for years, the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014, and the terrible and ongoing war in the Donbas, the situation has found its high point. The risk of a renewed escalation looms large, with potential consequences ranging from an intensification of the humanitarian crises to a broader conflict involving major powers. Finding a diplomatic resolution to the Ukraine crisis remains a pressing global priority. However, a partitioned Ukraine - with seaports such as Sevastopol in Russian occupation - is a possible, if not likely, outcome and risk. Once again, global trade routes and access to parts and resources such as wheat and other agricultural products are affected. Again, this is already happening - gruesomely illustrated in Ukraine’s share in global exports of selected crops.
The global fight for access to critical minerals has become a central focus in international geopolitics and economic strategies. As demand for rare earth elements, lithium, and other vital minerals surges due to their crucial role in advanced technologies, renewable energy, and manufacturing, nations are actively vying for control over key mining sites. This competition has geopolitical implications, impacting national security, economic dominance, and technological advancements. The struggle for access to critical minerals underscores the intricate balance between resource scarcity, environmental sustainability, and the pursuit of technological innovation in an increasingly interconnected world. One interesting indicator regarding crucial minerals is export restrictions or export tariffs. They have been on the rise.
These measures have the potential to influence the worldwide supply of critical minerals, leading to increased pressures on global prices. This raises concerns about the security of the supply chain for raw materials to manufacturers, as highlighted in reports from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Given that the access to critical minerals sits upstream to an abundance of products - especially in the high-tech sector - the supply chain (yet again) seems at peril.
As the world's second-largest economy, China's global economic health has profound implications. Today, China has parted ways with the believed unwaverly growth trajectory it has grown accustomed to. Due to economic slowdowns, debt crises, or other factors, a swift return to the former growth path is at odds. With that, risk extends not only to sourcing parts and materials from China but to sales, too: The Consumer Confidence Index has found its all-time low for the time being.
The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has outpaced regulatory frameworks, giving rise to concerns about the potential consequences of ungoverned AI. From deepfake technology, and erosion of privacy to the impact on cyber security, the rampant growth of AI poses significant risks. Striking the right balance between innovation and regulation is crucial to harnessing the benefits of AI while mitigating potential harm.
The threat is real and already here. Here is one example: In 2022, U.S. state and federal courts witnessed a surge in AI-related legal cases, reaching a total of 110, approximately seven times the number recorded in 2016. The focal points of these cases were predominantly in California, New York, and Illinois, involving matters pertaining to civil, intellectual property, and contract law.
PMOs are asked to prioritize smartly and take action - and if so, very swiftly, if necessary. For one, the risk complex described shows heavy potential to disturb global trade further and potential issues regarding the global supply chain and, hence, access to parts and resources. Mitigation strategies are manifold - but often expensive. For example, companies may look into diversifying suppliers, dual or multi-sourcing, increasing working capital and stock, increasing in-house production, near- instead of offshoring, creating contingency plans, and monitoring geopolitical developments that may impact international trade routes. PMOs need to understand the severity of the situation on the individual company level to such an extent that smart prioritization and swift action are possible. This puts additional pressure on PMOs and the C-Level, too.
Our own little study named #SHIFTHAPPENS23 has brought forward quite a few interesting findings. Amongst others, we found that in 2023, German companies often tried to cut costs and refrained from high-risk projects more than in less volatile times - although especially the more risky endeavors were assigned with a higher strategic value. In fact, strategic ambitions - such as business model innovation - were commonly put on hold in favor of projects helping weather the current storm of risks. Especially this kind of swift adaption favors a central unit overseeing the entire project portfolio: the PMO. If you would like to read more about what we found when asking more than 460 German company representatives, feel free to do so here.
The mentioned countermeasures are just examples and do naturally not extend to all risks mentioned. What measures need to be taken and when - if at all - remains to be seen. But this little excursion to the project side of things aims to illustrate a broader point: companies may need to react quickly in times of global uncertainty. Complete transparency on the entire project portfolio is essential to do so at scale. Only then can intelligent prioritization be brought forward. PMOs play a pivotal role in securing full transparency at all times!
That is easier said than done. Several things need to be in place to keep the level of transparency high. For one, suitable software helps. If you want to learn what makes a good Project Portfolio Management Software, feel free to go down the rabbit hole here.
For many years, our Nordantech experts have been developing Falcon: a lightweight software solution that helps you monitor your project portfolio in the best possible way and to achieve your company's strategic goals. Leading companies have already used Falcon in their project portfolios!
We would be happy to show you Falcon in detail in a personal meeting!
Schedule a demo now!